| - The name of the banker is Paul Mankewicz -or witzc- and he was the second in a row of 3 jewish, supposedly at the time zionist, President of the "Deutsche Bank", -now look who was on the board of Deutsche Bank, no Jews ? Now zionists* *Zionists :"leadership with no people and no land, in the way of everybody.- and the author of the book where it is written is Eduard Stadtler. The Title is "Weltrevolutionskrieg". At a time Stadtler was the "political leader" of the Ullstein Verlag. Ullstein was connected to the Hearst concern, Hearst was a strong supporter of Nazism - or not ? He knew all about Propaganda and brainwashing us, the masses. Hearst must have used the modern technics of propaganda through Bernays, Edwar L, nephew of Sigmund Freud and "Father of Spin". Göbbels loved him, as the books of Freud, the only possible antidote, were being burnt in the street. But not by the german people, but by the al-queida of the time. some in plane cloth, some in neat BROWN uniforms freshly imported from USA. With blinking buttons that called for discipline. And Gulasch a Kanone for food. With credits from BROWN brothers, Union Bank. As were the new Remmington rifles, smuggled into the de-militarised zone, through the lines, under the eyes of their royal dutch and belgian police forces via Antwerp up the Rhine. Who, at the time sat on the board of Remington arms ? This was the dawn of the proletarian revolution in Germany - at least for them. Lenin had just announced it and called for it. Just one other -logical- step. -They thought themselves as the drivers, but realy were driven. They were f**d and they knew it - as they kwoe now.- This is the view of Stadtler that he presented to the assembeled Cream of the internatianally long and short connected cream of Bankers and industrialists. Connected through money and family binds, clubs and associations. Linked and interconected. In this book, Eduard Stadtler broadly desribes the event , on which he himself held a speech, that would finally convince the biggest german "Industrialists" to put money, 500.000 goldmarks, into a fund, as an insurance against "bolschevism". A black fund like the already existing Russel fund of s&b,etc. a corporate army after the model that Rockefeller had used in his earlier, more rugged times. Yellow organisations. Fals flag Operations.They are common these days, then they were knew + most people were still unsuspicious. From this fund was financed the Schwarze Reichswehr" + Hitler seems to have recieved 20 Marks a week from them to be a spy inside the masses. Do not forget, they had no NSA then, nor had they any of the other sophisticated means of todays scientific fascism. In the light of the still ongoing bolschewist revolution and the risk placed to them, they'd rather believe into the marxist propaganda, they themself had had time to study in germany. They were very much afraid, internationally, the capitalists, and thought, it could be true,and that the german proletarians could follow the russian example, as they were already "fraternizing" in the east, they could do the same in the west, there was a strong link between the french and the german section of the "Internatianale" This would have cost the King of England its head, long overdue it seemed then, followed by the uprise of the american working class. The rest would have followed automatically. This was what these gentleman were -and are- so much afraid of and they preempt-ed it. They all had learned the French lesson of 1789 : Don't oppose to a people's revolution, LEAD them ! Bismarck could only get the steam out of the "revolutionary" social-democrats by means of "revolution from above". That meant corrupting the opposition by buing its leaders-as long as there are any- and giving in on some of the wishes in the masses. -Later Bernays tought them to manipulate those wishes, which made ruling a bit easier. They founded the "Antibolschewistische Liga". The "World anticommunist whatsoever* " are all continuations of that. They* - have all been named. They financed all sorts of groups, forcing a siege on the forming USSR. Splitting. Seeding dout. Dividing. Disconnecting the dots. This was just the german front. This is BEFORE Versailles. The Deutsche Bank had very close conection to the Harriman concern. Schopenhauer was their conceptional ideologist. Privately they must have studied Marx + taken their conclusion, which in public they denied and tried to destroy. Don't forget the Financial Times history marxist german jewish? analyst conributer, whose name now I cannot remember. Harriman + Rockefeller were brothers in skulls. Rockefeller, through Morgan was tied to Rothschild - or not? Rothschild is necessarily tied to Bank of England, some would say opposit. Bank of England chief N. Montague and German master mind banker and conspirationalist -sic- who got away with it at Nuremberg, Schacht, Hjalmar Horace Greeley. Same family. At a time Deutsche Bank had been cruxial to Harriman. Was it 1913 ? or 1901 ? or even 18something ? Credit Mobilier ? Crashes ? Of course there is Rockefeller, Citybank, where the admitted murder of Luxemburg + Liebknecht got a Visa through and a undescribed job, well after WWII. IG Farben and no Rockefeller ? There is almost nothing i have found on Mankiewizc. or witc. But google for Stadtler, Eduard + that may change your view. On Ford : A huge photograph of him was placed in the early Nazi headquarters in Munich, together with heaps of his books on sale. The Nazi headquarters had been financed with credit from Thyssen ("I financed Hitler") , this time 1923, officially and admittedly + as we know now, with credit from Bank for Haandel & Schippvaardt, which was held by himself and Harriman bank, in which he had his share. -and- Where at a time Prescot Bush, s&b was a director on the board. I don't elaborate. But THESE people know their history and what's at stake. Leaders, kings, have never had any doubt of their duty to kill their „own“ peoples for any given reason that people believe in or are made to believe in. As long as that works. Why is it seemingly so hard to see, that zionist, jewish leaders may be not different in that respect. P.S.: Thanks for not deleting it. ...just looked up "loopiness" : Loopiness As a Pedagogical Methodology. Anne Dalke and Paul Grobstein May 2002. I'm sure You wouldn't have used it in the sense of "insane". Millions of german people got killed by german „Leaders“. And NOT possibly millions of jewish people got sarificed by their jewish leaders for higher, holly aims ? -Impossible to think. How many uprisings are there reported – in camparison among the two groups ? To butcher the german masses, they used a german leader, that they allowed to emerge, and to butcher the jewish masses -of eastern europe, which were not so much in esteem of the wealthy jewish middle – and upper classes of america and western europe- they used the same one. What problem one has with thinking it that way, that they might not have ? By the way, traditionally, Central European People have shown to be much less prone to „leadership“ than the Hebrows. Although between them of the greatest. The leadership is always divided. The most stupid incorporates the leader. The critic, almost always unkown, in the dark. Understanding the other side. Always in risk to deflect. The first one likely to get killed by the others. The critic can be a social body, like in the USSR. Than they have to liquidate the whole body. Joseph : 11:32 AM „Now we are being told that Jews were behind the counter-revolution!)“ [ „I still think that we can draw a valid historical comparison between Israeli and Nazi usage of the "collective punishment" tactic --“] anon 5:37 : : NO, thats NOT what You are being told, its the opposit that you are beeing told : „Israeli“ is a myth, to bridge and cover the strong gap inside the jewish people, which is the same gap that is now in every People. Its the class gap. The division that runs through the human-inhuman race. Its evolutionary, as long as it is not humanely contained. Which IS „the Beast“-that is the unnatural animal, earlier called „demons“ or „devil-s-“. Das Kapital hat kein Vaterland“.- Which roughly translated is „ there is no such thing as a homeland for the Capital-ists“. Same is obviously true saying for the prolatarians. Not even jews in general identify nazi with german. This thanks to some communist, socialist,anrchist and so on resisters. Unto 1939 the sort of jewish council cooperated with the nazis. Jewish held capital was exported to Palestine. Billions. That was helping the Zionist by weakening the british. Why not ? Mind the gap? Its a class-gap. Simply spoken.. | 